So I think democracy in the long-term in our countries will survive if it comes to be associated with leadership will not survive if democracy plus media brings to us more and more followship rather than leadership.
Leadership is hard to define and good leadership even harder. But if you can get people to follow you to the ends of the earth you are a great leader.
Leadership consists not in degrees of technique but in traits of character it requires moral rather than athletic or intellectual effort and it imposes on both leader and follower alike the burdens of self-restraint.
I start with the premise that the function of leadership is to produce more leaders not more followers.
The function of leadership is to produce more leaders not more followers.
A functioning robust democracy requires a healthy educated participatory followership and an educated morally grounded leadership.
Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower.
Nevertheless I consider OOP as an aspect of programming in the large that is as an aspect that logically follows programming in the small and requires sound knowledge of procedural programming.
From all this it follows what the general character of the problem of the development of a body of scientific knowledge is in so far as it depends on elements internal to science itself.
A man of knowledge chooses a path with a heart and follows it and then he looks and rejoices and laughs and then he sees and knows.
The study and knowledge of the universe would somehow be lame and defective were no practical results to follow.
Consider your origins: you were not made to live as brutes but to follow virtue and knowledge.
I was bold in the pursuit of knowledge never fearing to follow truth and reason to whatever results they led and bearding every authority which stood in their way.
Nature is at work. Character and destiny are her handiwork. She gives us love and hate jealousy and reverence. All that is ours is the power to choose which impulse we shall follow.
Yes we have a specific procedure which we follow in all cases where the Agency is in contact for the purposes of acquiring intelligence or whatever the case may be with an individual.
I do not - I never believed it's better to kill a terrorist than to detain him. We want to detain as many terrorists as possible so we can elicit the intelligence from them in the appropriate manner so that we can disrupt follow-on terrorist attacks.
God does not require you to follow His leadings on blind trust. Behold the evidence of an invisible intelligence pervading everything even your own mind and body.