Religion was used as an ideology as a system of control. When they forced the veil upon women they were using it as an instrument of control in the same way that in Mao's China people were wearing Mao jackets and women were not supposed to wear any makeup.

No power of government ought to be employed in the endeavor to establish any system or article of belief on the subject of religion.

I just hate one-dimensional portrayals of religion it's too cheap and easy to do and ignores the nuances that go into having a belief system.

All theory of modernity in sociology suggests that the more modernity there is the less religion. In my theory we can realize that this is wrong: atheism is only one belief system among many.

Islam is a violent I was going to say religion but it's not a religion. It's a political system. It's a violent political system bent on the overthrow of the governments of the world and world domination. That is the ultimate aim.

I am not systematic at all when it comes to religion. I just love life. And I'm not judgmental. And I'm a vegetarian.

All too many Muslims fail to grasp Islam which teaches one to be lenient towards others and to understand their value systems knowing that these are tolerated by Islam as a religion.

Any system of religion that has anything in it that shocks the mind of a child cannot be true.

When we blindly adopt a religion a political system a literary dogma we become automatons. We cease to grow.

One strength of the communist system of the East is that it has some of the character of a religion and inspires the emotions of a religion.

The power of the American system of republicanism lies in its capacity to allow religious belief to be a competing not a controlling factor in American life.

What is the system? It revolves around the banks the system is built on the power of the banks so it can be destroyed through the banks.

When you give everyone a voice and give people power the system usually ends up in a really good place. So what we view our role as is giving people that power.

Men have defined the parameters of every subject. All feminist arguments however radical in intent or consequence are with or against assertions or premises implicit in the male system which is made credible or authentic by the power of men to name.

Nothing has such power to broaden the mind as the ability to investigate systematically and truly all that comes under thy observation in life.

I was now resolved to do everything in my power to defeat the system.

The value systems of those with access to power and of those far removed from such access cannot be the same. The viewpoint of the privileged is unlike that of the underprivileged.