I believe that we were not as effective in the second term dealing with this issue of nuclear none proliferation as we had been during the first term when we stripped Libya and Iraq and A.Q. Khan and their capacity to proliferate nuclear technology.
When we're talking about technology that involves weapons of mass destruction nuclear chemical or biological weapons there has to be an element of preemption.
Don't let that weapon technology proliferate. Don't let Saddam Hussein get capability for nuclear or chemical weapons because he's already shown a willingness to use any weapon at his disposal.
Pro football is like nuclear warfare. There are no winners only survivors.
Indeed the whole human species is endangered by nuclear weapons or by other means of wholesale destruction which further advances in science are likely to produce.
One of the things that ultimately led me to leave mathematics and go into political science was thinking I could prevent nuclear war.
Of all the failed technologies that litter the onward march of science - steam carriages zeppelins armoured trains - none has been so catastrophic to prosperity as the last century's attempt to generate electricity from nuclear fission.
Putin has a lot at stake here and restoring the relationship with the United States and there are already signs as Sandy mentioned that he's moving in the right direction to begin to ascertain that their trade with Iran is not used for the production of nuclear weapons.
This is a very important relationship we have with Russia the relationship over the nuclear arsenal that they have obviously is important. They're a very powerful country.
One thing you can say about nuclear power: the people who believe it is the silver bullet for America's energy problems never give up.
The oil companies regard nuclear power as their rival who will reduce their profits so they put out a lot of disinformation about nuclear power.
This nuclear option is ultimately an example of the arrogance of power.
I have heard that the Saudi Arabians are paying Greenpeace to campaign against Nuclear Power. It wouldn't surprise me at all.
I would like nuclear fusion to become a practical power source. It would provide an inexhaustible supply of energy without pollution or global warming.
As a nuclear power - as the only nuclear power to have used a nuclear weapon - the United States has a moral responsibility to act.
All the waste in a year from a nuclear power plant can be stored under a desk.
What could become a danger to world peace is Iran's nuclear program and the country's open threat to annihilate Israel.