With paper printed books you have certain freedoms. You can acquire the book anonymously by paying cash which is the way I always buy books. I never use a credit card. I don't identify to any database when I buy books. Amazon takes away that freedom.

If ebooks mean that readers' freedom must either increase or decrease we must demand the increase.

In the free/libre software movement we develop software that respects users' freedom so we and you can escape from software that doesn't.

Free software is software that respects your freedom and the social solidarity of your community. So it's free as in freedom.

Value your freedom or you will lose it teaches history. 'Don't bother us with politics' respond those who don't want to learn.

One of the unsung freedoms that go with a free press is the freedom not to read it.

There's also a sense of freedom. I was so obsessed by this problem that I was thinking about if all the time - when I woke up in the morning when I went to sleep at night and that went on for eight years.

All Americans and freedom-loving people around the world owe President Reagan our deepest gratitude for his strong principled leadership that ended the Cold War and brought freedom to millions of people.

To deny the freedom of the will is to make morality impossible.

President Bush in his inaugural address talked about bringing freedom to countries that don't have it. He didn't specify how.

I started skydiving because I loved the idea of freedom.

Freedom is an internal achievement rather than an external adjustment.

Government has the role of suiting people for freedom. People aren't made for freedom spontaneously. There's sort of a 19-year race between when people are born and when they become adults. And government has a role in making them at the end of 19 years suited to be upright trustworthy repositories of popular sovereignty.

Freedom means the freedom to behave coarsely basely foolishly.

The increased presence of Muslims in Italy and in Europe is directly proportional to our loss of freedom.

It is hard to know how many people do but given that the people are so docile towards the rulers nowadays very few Americans show the passion for freedom that our forefathers had.

But in the first Gulf war the United Kingdom was not under any threat from Iraq and is still less so in the second one. Then there is no justification for obstructing freedom of information particularly as nations have a right to know what their soldiers are being used for.